How PIM Evaluation Can Level Up
The second part of a two-part series, we offer recommendations for regulators from our research on performance incentive mechanism evaluation.
On this page, explore RMI’s groundbreaking work across the United States and our resources to guide policymakers, energy professionals, and advocates in developing and implementing effective state-based solutions for the energy transition.
State-level leadership is driving the energy transition across the United States. In this section, explore RMI’s most impactful insights, articles, and webpages by state to see how different regions are engaging with issues across the energy transition, from building efficiency to electricity decarbonization.
Click on a state below to see state policy resources for that state.
In this section, we have highlighted resources tailored to different decision makers, including state legislators and local government officials and regulators. This content is organized to help stakeholders at all levels of state governance, as well as advocates involved in the decision-making process, find the most relevant guidance and tools to shape state climate and energy outcomes. For additional materials on state public utilities commissions, see RMI's Regulatory Resources Dashboard.
As states embark on their individual climate and energy plans, some opportunities and policies can be applied or recreated across regions and states. In this section, we’ve compiled content showcasing major policy initiatives that can be implemented across the United States, as well as success stories demonstrating policy implementation in some states that can be used as a template for future efforts.
In this section, explore RMI’s web tools designed to support policy analysis and decision-making at the state level.
The second part of a two-part series, we offer recommendations for regulators from our research on performance incentive mechanism evaluation.
A handbook for US state regulators on how to advance proactive transmission buildout to reduce costs for ratepayers.
As electricity prices rise, we offer recommendations for governors seeking to provide near-term relief for customers and lower system costs in the long run.
To keep up with grid innovation and investments, regulators can be more agile by updating stakeholder engagement, docket processes, and operations.
Near-term actions Michigan decision makers can take to enable virtual power plants to support Michigan’s electric grid.
Wisconsin ratepayers have already been stranded by fossil fuels once, but a second mistake — and higher rates — can be prevented.
Reinvesting in the Colstrip power plant with solar, wind, and battery storage will mean improved health and lower energy bills for Montana communities.
Regulators in the Western United States must understand the key drivers of resource adequacy risk and the options available to navigate them.
Federal incentives, interconnection queue shortcuts, strong engagement and support from the community and local workers, and an involved regulator helped lead the way for to transition a coal community into a clean energy driver.
A regulatory gap has led to a costly shift in utility investment to local transmission assets, putting the energy transition at risk.