Skip to content

Unpublished letter to the Economist

Jump to Section

Your lament for Europe’s money-losing electric utilities, pickled in their own brine, begs the question whether old, long-and often still-subsidized oligopolies should be bailed out or shielded from competition when they bet against innovation and lose. They were supposed, but failed, to prepare for renewables by reinvesting their hundreds of billions of Euros’ windfall from billing customers for the first decade’s tradeable carbon emission credits they’d been given for free. Now they’re whining that disruptive technologies are upending their old models. Of course: should we reject mobile phones because they disrupt wire line telcos? A well-designed, technology-neutral electric capacity market is worthwhile, but botched investment strategy should not be rewarded, nor should shareholders be surprised that utility shares no longer perform like bonds when 21st-century technology and speed collide with 20th- and 19th-century institutions, rules, and cultures.

About the Authors

Amory Lovins

Amory Lovins

Cofounder and Chairman Emeritus

Help build the clean energy future. Donate today.

Independent research. Real-world solutions. Supported by donors.

RMI can pursue the highest-impact climate and energy solutions because we’re supported by people who believe change is possible. Every gift helps advance the work needed to make clean energy the default choice worldwide.

For other ways to give to RMI, including checks or gifts of stock, please visit Other Ways to Give.