Skip to content

Built-In Benefits: Designing State-Led Energy Zones with Communities

How states can incorporate community engagement and benefits into Energy Zone design and implementation

By Erifili Draklellis, Kristine Chan Lizardo, and Leah Komos

Jump to Section

Energy Zones are emerging as a proactive statewide planning strategy to identify areas well suited for future energy development. They also create an opportunity to improve how communities participate in planning and how tangible benefits from new infrastructure reach host communities.

Today, generation and grid development often proceeds project by project. Communities and local governments may face repeated, uncoordinated engagement from multiple developers, while community benefits are negotiated separately for each project. This can increase demands on communities, push local input later in the planning process, and produce fragmented engagement and benefit outcomes.

Energy Zone planning can move key questions earlier. By engaging communities, community-based and environmental justice organizations, and local and Tribal governments during zone design, states can surface local priorities and land-use considerations, establish clearer implementation expectations, and define community benefit frameworks before individual projects arrive.

What states should consider

Built-In Benefits: Designing State-Led Energy Zones with Communities examines three core design questions:

  • Who participates in Energy Zone planning and what roles can different stakeholders play?
  • When and how can stakeholder input influence designation criteria, maps, implementation, and project development?
  • How can community benefits be calculated, structured, governed, and allocated?

The brief also examines practical approaches to benefit design. A zone-level framework can establish baseline expectations for contribution levels, eligible benefit structures, governance, and allocation while preserving defined areas for project-specific variation. It shows how states can pressure-test whether standardized contributions will produce material value and compares common mechanisms such as PILOTs, host community agreements, community benefits agreements, direct payments, and aggregated funds.

From statewide planning to local value

Community engagement and benefits are integral to translating statewide Energy Zone planning into projects that work in host communities. Addressing these considerations during zone design can create clearer expectations before projects are proposed, reduce repeated project-by-project negotiation, and create pathways for communities to realize tangible value from energy development.

Additional Contributors:

Beverly Bendix

Authors

Kristine Chan Lizardo

Kristine Chan Lizardo

Leah Komos

Leah Komos

Associate

Help build the clean energy future. Donate today.

Independent research. Real-world solutions. Supported by donors.

RMI can pursue the highest-impact climate and energy solutions because we’re supported by people who believe change is possible. Every gift helps advance the work needed to make clean energy the default choice worldwide.

For other ways to give to RMI, including checks or gifts of stock, please visit Other Ways to Give.