Skip to content

Recalibrating the Role of Insurance in Resilience

Jump to Section

Since the emergence of modern insurance for trade ships in the late 1600s, the insurance sector has been designed primarily to protect against risk and absorb financial losses. However, as compounding pressures reshape the insurance system, there is a growing focus on the role of insurers in supporting investment in and adoption of resilience solutions not only to manage risk but also to actively reduce it.

As narratives about insurers’ role regarding resilience gain momentum, this report explores the underlying assumptions and identifies areas for further nuance and shared responsibility.

Four common assumptions about insurers and resilience:

1
Investments in resilience should automatically translate into lower insurance premiums.
2
Insurers can be primary actors responsible for incentivizing resilience.
3
Demonstrating a clear return on investment is sufficient to unlock more investment.
4
Insurers can manage risk primarily by covering losses with reinsurance and withdrawing from markets and therefore have limited incentive to support resilience.

While these assumptions often contain elements of truth, they can overlook important market realities, operational constraints, and tradeoffs. To help add nuance to these assumptions, and identify barriers to further influence resilience outcomes by the insurance system, the report goes into more detail on some of the underlying challenges:

Five constraints hindering insurers’ capacity to incentivize resilience:

1
Misaligned time horizons
2
Misaligned cost-benefit incentives
3
Organizational business models and governance
4
Methodological gaps in translating resilience into financial metrics
5
Policy, market, and customer dependencies

The goal of this report is not to downplay ambition. Insurers do have a role in supporting resilience, and many are already taking steps to do so. However, this report argues that civil society expectations for insurers to drive climate resilience are outpacing the realities of how insurance markets function. We outline three essential shifts we think are needed to unlock a more constructive path forward that can help focus our collective efforts on practical solutions and add nuance to key narratives.

Three essential shifts to unlock a more constructive path forward:

1
Rightsize the role of insurers within an enabling system
2
Improve methodologies for quantifying resilience benefits and co-benefits and reflect these in insurance pricing and risk models
3
Enhance public-private partnerships and involve insurers earlier in resilience incentive and policy design

These are not new recommendations. Other organizations have made similar calls to action in various configurations in recent years, and in some cases are already actively working to implement them. Yet, we include them here to acknowledge that they are not yet common practice, to demonstrate their importance in unlocking our vision for a recalibration of the role of insurance in resilience, and to affirm our willingness to roll up our sleeves and support these efforts going forward.

Authors

Elizabeth Harnett

Elizabeth Harnett

Research and Impact Expert

Help build the clean energy future. Donate today.

Independent research. Real-world solutions. Supported by donors.

RMI can pursue the highest-impact climate and energy solutions because we’re supported by people who believe change is possible. Every gift helps advance the work needed to make clean energy the default choice worldwide.

For other ways to give to RMI, including checks or gifts of stock, please visit Other Ways to Give.