Learn how we are working to transform how we use and produce energy.
Recalibrating the Role of Insurance in Resilience
Why we share this work for free
RMI is an independent nonprofit working to accelerate the clean energy transition. We publish research like this to inform decision-makers and drive real-world impact.
Our work is supported by philanthropy as well as partnerships, including fee-for-service engagements. This support makes it possible for us to share our independent insights for free.
If you find this work valuable, you can support it anytime.
Get more insights like this
Stay up to date with the latest research, analysis, and tools from RMI by opting in to receive occasional emails below. You’ll get new reports, event invitations, and practical insights to help us all accelerate the clean energy transition.
Loading form...
Your download should start automatically. If it doesn’t, click the download button below.
This work is made possible by philanthropy
RMI is a nonprofit supported by donors and partners. Philanthropy enables us to produce independent research and make resources like this freely available.
If you find this report valuable, please consider supporting our work. You can also explore how we partner with organizations to drive impact.
Jump to Section
Since the emergence of modern insurance for trade ships in the late 1600s, the insurance sector has been designed primarily to protect against risk and absorb financial losses. However, as compounding pressures reshape the insurance system, there is a growing focus on the role of insurers in supporting investment in and adoption of resilience solutions not only to manage risk but also to actively reduce it.
As narratives about insurers’ role regarding resilience gain momentum, this report explores the underlying assumptions and identifies areas for further nuance and shared responsibility.
Four common assumptions about insurers and resilience:
While these assumptions often contain elements of truth, they can overlook important market realities, operational constraints, and tradeoffs. To help add nuance to these assumptions, and identify barriers to further influence resilience outcomes by the insurance system, the report goes into more detail on some of the underlying challenges:
Five constraints hindering insurers’ capacity to incentivize resilience:
The goal of this report is not to downplay ambition. Insurers do have a role in supporting resilience, and many are already taking steps to do so. However, this report argues that civil society expectations for insurers to drive climate resilience are outpacing the realities of how insurance markets function. We outline three essential shifts we think are needed to unlock a more constructive path forward that can help focus our collective efforts on practical solutions and add nuance to key narratives.
Three essential shifts to unlock a more constructive path forward:
These are not new recommendations. Other organizations have made similar calls to action in various configurations in recent years, and in some cases are already actively working to implement them. Yet, we include them here to acknowledge that they are not yet common practice, to demonstrate their importance in unlocking our vision for a recalibration of the role of insurance in resilience, and to affirm our willingness to roll up our sleeves and support these efforts going forward.
Related Insights
Improving Energy Transition Assessments with Regional Pathways
What Michigan’s Clean Community Financing Ecosystem Can Teach Other US Regions
Help build the clean energy future. Donate today.
Independent research. Real-world solutions. Supported by donors.
RMI can pursue the highest-impact climate and energy solutions because we’re supported by people who believe change is possible. Every gift helps advance the work needed to make clean energy the default choice worldwide.
For other ways to give to RMI, including checks or gifts of stock, please visit Other Ways to Give.