Learn how we are working to transform how we use and produce energy.
Carbon Neutrality Based on Native-Site Carbon Storage
Why we share this work for free
RMI is an independent nonprofit working to accelerate the clean energy transition. We publish research like this to inform decision-makers and drive real-world impact.
Our work is supported by philanthropy as well as partnerships, including fee-for-service engagements. This support makes it possible for us to share our independent insights for free.
If you find this work valuable, you can support it anytime.
Get more insights like this
Stay up to date with the latest research, analysis, and tools from RMI by opting in to receive occasional emails below. You’ll get new reports, event invitations, and practical insights to help us all accelerate the clean energy transition.
Loading form...
Your download should start automatically. If it doesn’t, click the download button below.
This work is made possible by philanthropy
RMI is a nonprofit supported by donors and partners. Philanthropy enables us to produce independent research and make resources like this freely available.
If you find this report valuable, please consider supporting our work. You can also explore how we partner with organizations to drive impact.
Jump to Section
A certain amount of emphasis has been placed on carbon-neutral design lately in the buildings industry. The emphasis has thus far been on building-operation emissions and to a certain degree the embodied emissions of construction. In response to this increased interest in carbon neutrality, this paper discusses alternative approaches to carbon neutrality and introduces a new definition. There are three main components to the presented carbon (C) neutrality computational model, which assesses the net carbon flux from the Earth to the atmosphere (or vice versa) as a result of a building project. The first is land use change, which accounts for the removal or addition of vegetation and other carbon-storing elements to the project site. The amount of native-state C storage can be defined as the baseline C storage value for the building project. The second and third emissions sources in the model are from the embodied carbon emissions of construction and the building operation. Carbon neutrality is defined such that the embodied emissions of construction as well as operation are completely offset by the end of the building lifetime. Moreover, if the design-state site C storage is less than the native state, than the net difference must be offset as well. As an example of the concept in practice, an institutional building in teh construction documentation phase in Lake Placid, Florida is examined. The introduced model allows for the assessment of buildings in a way that is arguably more helpful than calculating “net-zero” building operation emissions.
Related Insights
What Michigan’s Clean Community Financing Ecosystem Can Teach Other US Regions
Appliance Efficiency Standards: A Proven Tool for Affordability and Grid Reliability
Help build the clean energy future. Donate today.
Independent research. Real-world solutions. Supported by donors.
RMI can pursue the highest-impact climate and energy solutions because we’re supported by people who believe change is possible. Every gift helps advance the work needed to make clean energy the default choice worldwide.
For other ways to give to RMI, including checks or gifts of stock, please visit Other Ways to Give.